CHF - did you miss the actual headline -Possible threats against Chatham officials investigated?
The original headline was "Chatham officials threatened over immigration stance".
I sent emails to the reporter and the general manager as soon as I saw it. Apparently I was not the only one since they changed it the next morning.
Ms. Kelly,
Thank you for contacting WRAL and sharing your concerns. While some
Chatham County commissioners consider the language in several emails and
calls to be threatening, the sheriff's department does not believe that
language constitutes a threat, as defined in the state's criminal
statutes. We should have been more clear about that distinction.
Please know that our intent is always to inform ... never to inflame.
Rick Gall
News Director
WRAL News
-----Original Message-----
From: Donna Kelly
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 2:09 AM
To: Harris, John
Cc: FCC Public File Information; FCC Public File Information
Subject: WRAL.com Feedback - Chatham officials threatened over
immigration stance
I'm concerned about how a report by Erin Hartness on the situation in
Chatham County was portrayed. The title states that officials were
threatened. The lead in on the video also stresses that threats were
made.
Yet in the report Maj. Blankenship states there have been no actual
threats made.
"We are monitoring some incidents with the commissioners," said Maj.
Gary Blankenship of the Chatham County Sheriff's Office. "So far, none
that we have seen constitutes a threat, so we are just staying apprised
of the situation."
You also sensationalize an email to Commissioner Lucier:
After the decision in Chatham County, commissioners Chairman George
Lucier started getting e-mails with messages like "Sleep soundly while
you can!"
I stopped the video so I could read that email and although I can't read
the entire message, from what I can read the message seems more likely
to be suggesting that the commissioners are in danger from illegal
criminals that will be coming to the county in response to this
resolution than that the message writer is threatening the commissioner.
If that is the case it's an unjustified over-reaction but not a threat.
This is a very emotional issue. The Resolution and more importantly the
way it was handled has caused a lot of strain in our community. We do
not need inflamatory reporting to stir up emotions even more.
Please be more considerate of the people that live in this community if
you do any more reporting on this issue.