Chatham County Online BBS
February 09, 2012, 10:53:21 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Before you go out to eat check out the Local Restaurant Reviews
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Tags Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: NBC17 - Chatham County Residents Speak Out About Impact Fees  (Read 3117 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Silk_Hope
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 10:51:43 AM
Date Registerd:April 02, 2007, 08:29:04 PM
Posts: 8299



« Reply #30 on: September 23, 2009, 06:12:19 AM »

Also, make all renters with children pay a higher tax than those without, I do agree CB, once kids are out of school the taxes need to be removed. No one ever said raising kids was cheap.
Logged

Warming the Globe One Mile at a Time

"The oil may be found in Texas but the dipsticks are all in DC."

http://www.obamaclock.org/
WolfpackFan
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 07:33:41 AM
Date Registerd:February 23, 2006, 04:33:05 PM
Posts: 6861



« Reply #31 on: September 23, 2009, 08:13:12 AM »

Why not make education private and make parents pay for it?  I am sure that people that move here and do not have kids would love to not have to pay fees to build new schools.

So, Chris, if you run for mayor again, will you seriously make abolishing Pittsboro's school system a plank in your platform?

If I run for mayor, I will consider all viewpoints and input from the citizens of PBO before making a decision on any subject.
Logged

More today than yesterday - Mindy
mary51802
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:February 06, 2012, 07:14:50 PM
Date Registerd:July 05, 2008, 04:58:25 PM
Posts: 4071


we are all beautiful


« Reply #32 on: September 23, 2009, 08:19:59 AM »

Cut out the bus, cut out the human relations director, cut out the non-profit contributions, cut out all of the studies (and just listen to your constituents), cut out things like the Parks department's new office space (use a cubicle, like everyone else), cut out the special elections...

Then see how much money you have.  Cuts first...tax increases if that's not enough.

Our spending has gone up by >50% in 5 years... there is fat aplenty to cut.

I agree although I do support the bus as it brings Chapel Hillians here to shop. But there is way too much fat in the gvmt. There are redundundent studies from a lot of non profits and the county health office and they could just fund one.
Logged

pinning down the truth is like catching a fart in a windstorm.......
snowcamper
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Yesterday at 09:49:48 PM
Date Registerd:January 16, 2007, 12:22:51 PM
Posts: 2958


Let there be light!


« Reply #33 on: September 23, 2009, 10:05:14 AM »

I agree although I do support the bus as it brings Chapel Hillians here to shop. But there is way too much fat in the gvmt. There are redundundent studies from a lot of non profits and the county health office and they could just fund one.

How many of those Hillians have cars of their own and would have come down anyway, but find a $300k+ per year bus a more "patting yourself on the back" method of getting down here?  Their anecdotal presence does not mean the bus is "worth it", it simply means they took the option to get here that someone else paid for.

And if they can afford to shop in downtown Pittsboro...they can probably afford a car.

Does an $8 meal at the General Store justify the massive expense?  Or maybe it's a $3 slice of Pizza from Elizabeths...or a $2.50 icecream cone from S&T's...  hard to see how the economics work out there...
Logged
Jabberwock
Chathamite
***
Offline Offline

Last Login:December 21, 2011, 05:07:19 PM
Date Registerd:February 11, 2006, 10:40:30 AM
Posts: 128


« Reply #34 on: September 23, 2009, 10:29:42 AM »



If a child attends private school, exempt them from school property taxes. If they do attend public school make taxes higher for the more kids you have.
[/quote]

Where does this end?  Pay an admittance fee to enter the public playground?  Pay a toll for every lap around the CCCC trail?  Admission to the library?
Logged
WolfpackFan
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 07:33:41 AM
Date Registerd:February 23, 2006, 04:33:05 PM
Posts: 6861



« Reply #35 on: September 23, 2009, 11:04:22 AM »



If a child attends private school, exempt them from school property taxes. If they do attend public school make taxes higher for the more kids you have.

Where does this end?  Pay an admittance fee to enter the public playground?  Pay a toll for every lap around the CCCC trail?  Admission to the library?
[/quote]

Why not move more to a user fee tax system?
Logged

More today than yesterday - Mindy
mary51802
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:February 06, 2012, 07:14:50 PM
Date Registerd:July 05, 2008, 04:58:25 PM
Posts: 4071


we are all beautiful


« Reply #36 on: September 23, 2009, 11:12:15 AM »

I agree although I do support the bus as it brings Chapel Hillians here to shop. But there is way too much fat in the gvmt. There are redundundent studies from a lot of non profits and the county health office and they could just fund one.

How many of those Hillians have cars of their own and would have come down anyway, but find a $300k+ per year bus a more "patting yourself on the back" method of getting down here?  Their anecdotal presence does not mean the bus is "worth it", it simply means they took the option to get here that someone else paid for.

And if they can afford to shop in downtown Pittsboro...they can probably afford a car.

Does an $8 meal at the General Store justify the massive expense?  Or maybe it's a $3 slice of Pizza from Elizabeths...or a $2.50 icecream cone from S&T's...  hard to see how the economics work out there...

Chapel Hill people love public transportation and take it if they can. It will grow as the corridor on 15-501 gets busier. And with all the ultra liberals now in Pittsboro and coming fast that is definate!
« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 11:14:11 AM by mary51802 » Logged

pinning down the truth is like catching a fart in a windstorm.......
srvfan
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:December 19, 2011, 03:12:54 PM
Date Registerd:February 10, 2006, 03:21:51 PM
Posts: 1284



« Reply #37 on: September 23, 2009, 06:47:58 PM »


Where does this end?  Pay an admittance fee to enter the public playground?  Pay a toll for every lap around the CCCC trail?  Admission to the library?

On the flip side to this question

Why not do away with progressive taxes in general?  Or different taxes and fees on vehicles based on weight? Or gas/diesel tax, especially the disparity between tax on a gallon of gas and a gallon of diesel?

Everyone has access to the public playground, CCCC trail and library so we all pay taxes for them, everyone has access to the same roads so why am I charged more for my F-350 & dump truck tags and why do I pay more tax per gallon of diesel? 

Why not figure how much it takes to run the city/county/state/fed and then divide those numbers equally by citizens?
Logged

"The government forces those who sell pharmaceutical drugs to list the possible side effects, even if only a few people will suffer those side effects. Unfortunately, the government itself never tells us about the bad side effects of the things it prescribes."- Thomas Sowell
djkelly
Chathameister
****
Offline Offline

Last Login:August 01, 2011, 08:55:31 PM
Date Registerd:January 31, 2009, 10:16:44 PM
Posts: 740


« Reply #38 on: September 23, 2009, 07:12:33 PM »

Impact fees are popular with both taxpayers who don't look at the long term effects and politicians because they shift the cost burden to people that have no voice in the debate – the people that haven’t moved here yet. 

Fortunately many taxpayers are waking up and realizing that shifting the cost of unnecessary spending doesn't get rid of it and just leads to more unnecessary spending.

Still waiting to see if any politicians are waking up.
Logged

Always watch what people do, not only what they say.  For deeds will betray a lie.
belle
Guest
« Reply #39 on: September 23, 2009, 07:40:56 PM »


Where does this end?  Pay an admittance fee to enter the public playground?  Pay a toll for every lap around the CCCC trail?  Admission to the library?

On the flip side to this question

Why not do away with progressive taxes in general?  Or different taxes and fees on vehicles based on weight? Or gas/diesel tax, especially the disparity between tax on a gallon of gas and a gallon of diesel?

Everyone has access to the public playground, CCCC trail and library so we all pay taxes for them, everyone has access to the same roads so why am I charged more for my F-350 & dump truck tags and why do I pay more tax per gallon of diesel? 

Why not figure how much it takes to run the city/county/state/fed and then divide those numbers equally by citizens?

uh, big heavy trucks do more damage to the roads.

houses with more bedrooms tend to house more children, which cost the county money to educate.
Logged
Silk_Hope
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 10:51:43 AM
Date Registerd:April 02, 2007, 08:29:04 PM
Posts: 8299



« Reply #40 on: September 23, 2009, 07:44:21 PM »

Apartments are filled with kids all of the time, people move out and in constantly with more kids. Howabout heavily taxing renters since they don't pay property taxes.
Logged

Warming the Globe One Mile at a Time

"The oil may be found in Texas but the dipsticks are all in DC."

http://www.obamaclock.org/
belle
Guest
« Reply #41 on: September 23, 2009, 07:47:41 PM »

Apartments are filled with kids all of the time, people move out and in constantly with more kids. Howabout heavily taxing renters since they don't pay property taxes.

actually, they do, in their rent to the landlord, who pays property taxes.

or do you mean, tax rental income?
Logged
Silk_Hope
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 10:51:43 AM
Date Registerd:April 02, 2007, 08:29:04 PM
Posts: 8299



« Reply #42 on: September 23, 2009, 07:48:27 PM »

No, direct tax the occupants
Logged

Warming the Globe One Mile at a Time

"The oil may be found in Texas but the dipsticks are all in DC."

http://www.obamaclock.org/
belle
Guest
« Reply #43 on: September 23, 2009, 07:51:14 PM »

No, direct tax the occupants

they are too transient. it has to be the property owner. the kids tax the county's ability to supply education. tax the income from that.
Logged
Silk_Hope
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 10:51:43 AM
Date Registerd:April 02, 2007, 08:29:04 PM
Posts: 8299



« Reply #44 on: September 23, 2009, 07:53:35 PM »

Than heavily tax the owner for occupied units and he/she can pass it onto the residents. Earmark the money to the schools. This may give property owners some relief.
Logged

Warming the Globe One Mile at a Time

"The oil may be found in Texas but the dipsticks are all in DC."

http://www.obamaclock.org/
Tags:
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!