Freedom Handyman
Chathamite
 Offline
Last Login: Yesterday at 07:27:55 AM
Date Registerd:December 23, 2007, 08:51:43 AM
Posts: 268
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2010, 07:46:23 AM » |
|
Webster's New World Dictionary states:
Version (as it applies to this situation) is defined as " an account showing one point of view"
Fact is defined as "reality or truth".
As whipporwill posted, Jennifer's version is not fact. (allegedly)
Now we have a taste of Mr Andrew's brother's version. Will anyone post those findings (repeatedly) and judge him on that?
We all have seen, heard and read versions, but have we any facts?...................................
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.
Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army"
|
|
|
Chathammommy
Member
Offline
Last Login:May 04, 2010, 02:12:38 PM
Date Registerd:April 05, 2007, 12:33:20 PM
Posts: 46
|
|
« Reply #31 on: January 25, 2010, 06:05:17 PM » |
|
Did I miss something? Did Mr. Andrew's brother post something that I have not read? Can you tell me where I can find it? Thank you. Webster's New World Dictionary states:
Version (as it applies to this situation) is defined as " an account showing one point of view"
Fact is defined as "reality or truth".
As whipporwill posted, Jennifer's version is not fact. (allegedly)
Now we have a taste of Mr Andrew's brother's version. Will anyone post those findings (repeatedly) and judge him on that?
We all have seen, heard and read versions, but have we any facts?...................................
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Freedom Handyman
Chathamite
Offline
Last Login: Yesterday at 07:27:55 AM
Date Registerd:December 23, 2007, 08:51:43 AM
Posts: 268
|
|
« Reply #32 on: January 26, 2010, 06:07:07 AM » |
|
I think it was in this link |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.
Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army"
|
|
|
Chathammommy
Member
Offline
Last Login:May 04, 2010, 02:12:38 PM
Date Registerd:April 05, 2007, 12:33:20 PM
Posts: 46
|
|
« Reply #33 on: January 27, 2010, 11:54:54 AM » |
|
Very interesting!!! It will be nice when both sides of the story come out. It is quite obvious that Mrs. Andrews facts are not the truth. At least someone is finally speaking out on Mr. Andrews behalf.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WolfpackFan
Chathamohican
Offline
Last Login: Today at 10:54:56 AM
Date Registerd:February 23, 2006, 04:33:05 PM
Posts: 6861
|
|
« Reply #34 on: January 27, 2010, 01:24:14 PM » |
|
Very interesting!!! It will be nice when both sides of the story come out. It is quite obvious that Mrs. Andrews facts are not the truth. At least someone is finally speaking out on Mr. Andrews behalf.
No one knows what the facts and truth are at this point. It will be nicer when this story is over and everyone can find some new neighbors to provide them with a soap opera. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
More today than yesterday - Mindy
|
|
|
Chathammommy
Member
Offline
Last Login:May 04, 2010, 02:12:38 PM
Date Registerd:April 05, 2007, 12:33:20 PM
Posts: 46
|
|
« Reply #35 on: February 21, 2010, 08:44:14 AM » |
|
Very interesting!!! It will be nice when both sides of the story come out. It is quite obvious that Mrs. Andrews facts are not the truth. At least someone is finally speaking out on Mr. Andrews behalf.
No one knows what the facts and truth are at this point. It will be nicer when this story is over and everyone can find some new neighbors to provide them with a soap opera. Don't quite think it is a Soap Opera as you call it. The bottom line is there is a woman who is not telling all the facts. The truth will come out, hopefully. Remember, there are 2 sides to every story. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jennifer
Chathamite
Offline
Last Login:May 24, 2011, 06:07:17 PM
Date Registerd:August 15, 2007, 09:34:28 AM
Posts: 353
|
|
« Reply #36 on: February 21, 2010, 10:12:24 AM » |
|
Very interesting!!! It will be nice when both sides of the story come out. It is quite obvious that Mrs. Andrews facts are not the truth. At least someone is finally speaking out on Mr. Andrews behalf.
No one knows what the facts and truth are at this point. It will be nicer when this story is over and everyone can find some new neighbors to provide them with a soap opera. Don't quite think it is a Soap Opera as you call it. The bottom line is there is a woman who is not telling all the facts. The truth will come out, hopefully. Remember, there are 2 sides to every story. actually there are 3 sides to every story...his,hers and the TRUTH!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
enjoying chatham, one pour at a time....
|
|
|
A.FOMVS
Member
Offline
Last Login:November 08, 2011, 09:13:14 PM
Date Registerd:April 26, 2007, 07:28:28 AM
Posts: 68
|
|
« Reply #37 on: March 12, 2010, 08:13:02 AM » |
|
Re: The Saga Continues Ends... Trooper Demoted Fired: Trooper fired, but reason not stated 3/12/2010 A state trooper who was at the Pittsboro home of a woman when, she said, her estranged husband threatened her with a gun has been fired. N.C. Crime Control Secretary Reuben Young dismissed Trooper Anthony Scott last month after hearing his appeal on a demotion and reassignment. Neither Young nor the patrol would explain why, saying the information is confidential under the state's personnel law. http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/03/12/383607/trooper-fired-but-reason-not-stated.html |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
peacefulcapitalist
Chathamohican
Offline
Last Login: Today at 11:20:26 AM
Date Registerd:May 05, 2006, 10:37:32 AM
Posts: 1863
|
|
« Reply #38 on: March 12, 2010, 12:35:32 PM » |
|
It ain't over. You can get this firing will be appealed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I don't believe in superstitions. They're bad luck." -- Bobby Valentine
|
|
|
|
belle
Guest
|
|
« Reply #39 on: March 12, 2010, 02:14:52 PM » |
|
It ain't over. You can get this firing will be appealed.
the firing was the result of the demotion being appealed. but these troopers do go through some levels of appeal, and sometimes win. they must love their jobs. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
seavey
Chathamohican
Offline
Last Login: Yesterday at 06:54:33 PM
Date Registerd:March 07, 2007, 06:38:05 PM
Posts: 3031
|
|
« Reply #40 on: March 12, 2010, 03:03:15 PM » |
|
The appeal begins . . . http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/03/12/384911/court-papers-shed-light-on-troopers.htmlA former trooper fired last month for reasons the Highway Patrol won't explain, says in court papers that he lost his job for having an extramarital affair and failing to respond when his paramour was allegedly attacked by her estranged husband. In administrative court papers filed late yesterday, Scott says he should be disciplined, but not fired. He denies neglecting his duties that day and contends N.C. Crime Control Secretary Reuben Young's decision to dismiss him was excessive. Scott cites the discipline given to Commander Randy Glover 23 years ago when he was a young trooper as an example of unequal treatment. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"ohmygoshthisisgoingtobeatrainwreckbuticantlookaway"
|
|
|
|
belle
Guest
|
|
« Reply #41 on: March 12, 2010, 03:08:40 PM » |
|
The appeal begins . . . http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/03/12/384911/court-papers-shed-light-on-troopers.htmlA former trooper fired last month for reasons the Highway Patrol won't explain, says in court papers that he lost his job for having an extramarital affair and failing to respond when his paramour was allegedly attacked by her estranged husband. In administrative court papers filed late yesterday, Scott says he should be disciplined, but not fired. He denies neglecting his duties that day and contends N.C. Crime Control Secretary Reuben Young's decision to dismiss him was excessive. Scott cites the discipline given to Commander Randy Glover 23 years ago when he was a young trooper as an example of unequal treatment. hmmm. isn't the husband innocent until tried? if so, how did they determine there was anything to respond to on the Trooper's part? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
seavey
Chathamohican
Offline
Last Login: Yesterday at 06:54:33 PM
Date Registerd:March 07, 2007, 06:38:05 PM
Posts: 3031
|
|
« Reply #42 on: March 12, 2010, 03:30:34 PM » |
|
Check the article. There's stuff from the trooper's own statement.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"ohmygoshthisisgoingtobeatrainwreckbuticantlookaway"
|
|
|
|
belle
Guest
|
|
« Reply #43 on: March 12, 2010, 04:02:18 PM » |
|
Check the article. There's stuff from the trooper's own statement.
I read it. still. he says he wasn't there. he was out back being prudent. so how can they say he should have responded? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bornhere
Chathamite
Offline
Last Login:November 08, 2011, 02:56:07 PM
Date Registerd:October 29, 2007, 07:16:44 AM
Posts: 100
|
|
« Reply #44 on: March 12, 2010, 08:13:21 PM » |
|
If you had done this...right or wrong...would you want all these people in your business?? They both made bad judgements....it's there problem....give it a break...it's not you or your business.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
