Chatham County Online BBS
February 09, 2012, 04:19:08 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Read the best Chatlist posts at Chatham Chatlist Highlights
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Tags Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: N&O - Pittsboro board mum on job offer  (Read 1724 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
VAHeel
Guest
« Reply #15 on: August 15, 2007, 07:48:43 PM »

you two should go on the road.  I'd buy a ticket.
Logged
whatsup
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Yesterday at 06:04:19 PM
Date Registerd:March 02, 2006, 12:56:39 AM
Posts: 1432



« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2007, 05:17:42 PM »

Quote
Why does the rest of the town board get a free pass on this one?

I don't see any "clever" pictures or criticisms of them herein.

And unlike Voller, they actually get to vote.

Why the double standard?




don't get your underwear in a wad. This is not THE most important thing in my life (and I hope it isn't in yours, because if it is, honey, u have problems)

I personally like the picture of the eggs on the face and you do have to admit that the picture looks like Randy. I also think it will come to pass that those who voted for Randy will find that the yolk's on them.

Actually, I haven't found any good pictures of the other members. But hey, don't let me stop your creative juices from flowing. Knock yourself out and find some of your own.

And loosen that grip. No matter how uptight you get you'll never turn a piece of coal into a diamond.
Logged
Linda Felt
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:November 22, 2010, 04:21:53 PM
Date Registerd:July 19, 2007, 12:56:13 PM
Posts: 1284


« Reply #17 on: August 24, 2007, 09:55:03 PM »

Yes, it's very clear from the number of times you've posted them that you love your pictures.  Good for you - have fun.  Unfortunately, the ones who the "yolk" is really on are all the supporters of the current town board, which has mismanaged the town for 30 some-odd years.

It pains me that Voller gets the rap for the terrible job that the board has done.  For example, the Misenheimer thing.  He was hired and fired by the board, not Voller.  And yet some people still associate him with Voller.  The mayor only gets to vote to break a tie, which has been probably no more than 1-2% of the total votes in Voller's term.
Logged
chrstnhsbndfthr
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 09:50:52 AM
Date Registerd:February 20, 2006, 11:25:33 PM
Posts: 7792



« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2007, 10:23:30 AM »

Yes, it's very clear from the number of times you've posted them that you love your pictures.  Good for you - have fun.  Unfortunately, the ones who the "yolk" is really on are all the supporters of the current town board, which has mismanaged the town for 30 some-odd years.

It pains me that Voller gets the rap for the terrible job that the board has done.  For example, the Misenheimer thing.  He was hired and fired by the board, not Voller.  And yet some people still associate him with Voller.  The mayor only gets to vote to break a tie, which has been probably no more than 1-2% of the total votes in Voller's term.

We haven't forgotten the secret meeting (meetings?) between Voller, Starkweather, and Misenheimer.
Logged

“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.”
— Milton Friedman
Linda Felt
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:November 22, 2010, 04:21:53 PM
Date Registerd:July 19, 2007, 12:56:13 PM
Posts: 1284


« Reply #19 on: August 25, 2007, 10:42:19 AM »

This is trumped-up nonsense.  Voller told the press they met - where's the secret?  It was known from day one.  The meeting in question was reported to have been to address terms of Misenheimer's termination.  When have you ever seen terms of an agreement like that made public?  I never have.
Logged
chrstnhsbndfthr
Chathamohican
*****
Offline Offline

Last Login:Today at 09:50:52 AM
Date Registerd:February 20, 2006, 11:25:33 PM
Posts: 7792



« Reply #20 on: August 25, 2007, 11:18:31 AM »

There were a great many questions asked at the time about Starkweather's involvement and no answers were ever given.  They seem like reasonable questions to me.  What had to be hidden? Why if the only people who could hire and fire were the Town Board was there a seperate meeting with only Starkweather, Voller, and Misenheimer?  What was Starkweather's role? Was he representing Voller? Was he representing Misenheimer? Was he representing the Coalition? Why weren't otehr community leaders allowed to attend? 
Logged

“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.”
— Milton Friedman
lookout4us
Guest
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2007, 11:28:20 AM »

My question is for MR. Voller I know you read this, and also I guess the Town Board needs to ask, WHY was Starkweather involved anyway, he don't live in Pittsboro, he is outside the city limits. This has nothing to do with him, Voller has no right going to him, this whole Starkweather/Voller thing is wrong, just plain wrong !!!! I hate it for the people of Pittsboro !!!!!
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!